CNCzone.com-The Ultimate Machinist Community  
Google
 



Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Ultimate Machinist Community > Electronics > Gecko Drives
Welcome, AlanD.
You last visited: 07-16-2007 at 09:30 AM
Private Messages: Unread 0, Total 3.
User CP Forums Classifieds FAQ Donate Members List Calendar New Posts: 9270 (In 1890 Threads) Quick Links Log Out
Home Page Today's Posts My Replies Reviews Photo Gallery Web Links Mark Forums Read Advertise With Us Ad List

Gecko Drives Discuss all Gecko drives here and get direct support!




This forum is sponsored by:


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1   Add to kevinkoons's Reputation   Report Post  
Old 05-22-2007, 07:13 PM
kevinkoons kevinkoons is offline
Chip Sweeper
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Age: 43
Posts: 10
kevinkoons is on a distinguished road
Is this normal for Gecko Drives?

Hello Everyone!


When tuning the axis motors using the trim pot on the Gecko drive, the motor will suddenly stop when the trim pot is turned near the end of travel in the clockwise direction. When this happens the only way to get the motor to run again is to remove power from the gecko drive (power down the machine) and exit out of Mach 3, restart Mach 3 and then power the machine back up. Some times it is also necessary to reboot the computer in order to get the motor to function again.

I am also having this same problem with the motors suddenly stopping when running a program when the feed rate is 10 IPM or less. Running at 20 IPM for example, I can cut all day long with no issues at all!


I am running Mach 3, Version 2. I am using Gecko 212 drives. This is a Bridgeport retrofit Series 1 CNC machine with Sigma motors on the X and Y and a Superior on the Z. All axis motors have presented the same problem at one time or another.

When running a program I wrote specifically to trouble shoot the problem, the X Axis motor will quit at randomly. It has ran for as long as 4 hours and for as little as 10 minutes, maybe less.

I am at my whits end, just can't seem to figure this out. I know I am not the first person to use these old Bridgeport steppers, has anyone had a problem like this or something like this? Any ideas what it might be?

I configured the Gecko drive for NEMA 42 motors, and 10-micro step resolution. I have also tried 5-micro step, half step and full step, all with the same results.


Any help on this would be very much appreciated!


Kevin
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

  #2   Add to mike40272's Reputation   Report Post  
Old 05-23-2007, 06:01 AM
mike40272 mike40272 is offline
Chip Sweeper
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Louisville,Ky
Age: 55
Posts: 10
mike40272 is on a distinguished road
Hi,
I've had the same problem on 3 different Bridgeport series 1 Mills. The only
way I found to keep them running was to use a fan blowing directly on
them. The Gecko's (all 12) felt warm to the touch not Hot. I soon as I installed a fan they would run all day long. The steppers were sigma's
and superior's running at 5 amps 52 Volts. All three bridgeports are running
fine now. I am converting my own Bridgeport Series 1 right now. I will be
using Gecko 212's and Mach3 software.
Mike Carter
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

  #3   Add to mike40272's Reputation   Report Post  
Old 05-23-2007, 06:05 AM
mike40272 mike40272 is offline
Chip Sweeper
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Louisville,Ky
Age: 55
Posts: 10
mike40272 is on a distinguished road
Smile

Hi again,
one other thing, I never had to touch the trim pot. All the steppers ran fine
with the pot in the factory setting.
Later
Mike Carter
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

  #4   Add to kevinkoons's Reputation   Report Post  
Old 05-23-2007, 11:40 AM
kevinkoons kevinkoons is offline
Chip Sweeper
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Age: 43
Posts: 10
kevinkoons is on a distinguished road
So you think it is heat?

Hi Mike, thanks for the reply!

I thought about heat but I ruled it out because the only time the problem occurs is when I am running at slow feed rates. Not only that, but the problem sill sometimes present in just a few minutes or after as long as 4 hours! One time it happened on the Z axis which saw very little action in that particular program.

I will give a fan a try, what I got to lose at this point? Not sure that this is the problem however and would appreciate any other suggestions.


Regards,

Kevin
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

Sponsored Links
  #5   Add to kevinkoons's Reputation   Report Post  
Old 05-23-2007, 11:43 AM
kevinkoons kevinkoons is offline
Chip Sweeper
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Age: 43
Posts: 10
kevinkoons is on a distinguished road
Hey Mike, how did you configure your drives? Are you set for full, half, 5-us or 10-us stepping?

Thanks,

Kevin
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

  #6   Add to mike40272's Reputation   Report Post  
Old 05-23-2007, 12:02 PM
mike40272 mike40272 is offline
Chip Sweeper
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Louisville,Ky
Age: 55
Posts: 10
mike40272 is on a distinguished road
Smile

Hi,
I hope the fan helps, on the drives I have them set for micro stepping (5). I tried Half step but they seem to run smoother using micro stepping. If I can
think of anything I give you a shout. Have you posted this question on the
Bridgeport fourm? That fourm has lots of real experts, not kidding , they
really know their stuff.
Mike
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

  #7   Add to Mariss Freimanis's Reputation   Report Post  
Old 05-23-2007, 12:33 PM
Mariss Freimanis Mariss Freimanis is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 751
Mariss Freimanis is on a distinguished road
There is a possible reason for your experience assuming you are running the drive wide open (7A current set).

1) Depending on the trimpot adjustment, the trimpot adds a 0% to 20% of set current value to the motor phase current. This is to compensate or null an offset error introduced by your V / L (your supply voltage and your motor inductance).

2) The G202 / G202 short-circuit protect level is 8A. 20% of 7A is 1.4 Amps. 7A + 1.4A totals 8.4A which trips the drive's protection circuit latch. This latch is cleared (reset) by either recycling the power supply or momentarily hittting the DISABLE input.

3) The ADJUST full CW setting of 20% is to accomodate low inductance motors and have them run smoothly. Without that +20% offset they'd be at 5.6A at high supply voltages and run roughly.

Your Bridgeport motors are not low-inductance so in effect you are setting them to 8.4A with that trimpot wide open. The drive then trips at the 8A protection threshold and you get what you observe.

4) Setting ADJUST too high makes your Bridgeport motors run like crap as well below 10 IPM (if 1:1 or ungeared), never mind the protection trip problem. Here's how to set the ADJUST trimpot correctly:

4a) Return the ADJUST trimpot to the 11 o'clock position (at little CCW of center).

4b) Cause your machine to move at 5 IPM.

4c) Turn the ADJUST trimpot no more than +/- 1/8th of a turn CW/CCW. Listen to the motor. There will be a setting in that span where motor vibration dissapears. Tune it in back and forth a smidge a few times. Leave the ADJUST trimpot at that setting that nulls the vibration best. The drive won't ever trip the protection circuit again on its own when you do this.

4d) Don't want to bother with any of this? Just set the ADJUST trimpot to a little CCW of half-scale and call it a day. No more nuisance protection circuit trips that way either.

Mariss
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

  #8   Add to kreutz's Reputation   Report Post  
Old 05-23-2007, 01:19 PM
kreutz kreutz is offline
Master Machinist
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: US
Posts: 1,087
kreutz is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mariss Freimanis View Post
There is a possible reason for your experience assuming you are running the drive wide open (7A current set).

1) Depending on the trimpot adjustment, the trimpot adds a 0% to 20% of set current value to the motor phase current. This is to compensate or null an offset error introduced by your V / L (your supply voltage and your motor inductance)................

Mariss
Mariss;

Is this compensation similar to "slope compensation" used on current mode control?

Thanks,

Kreutz
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

Sponsored Links
  #9   Add to Mariss Freimanis's Reputation   Report Post  
Old 05-23-2007, 03:00 PM
Mariss Freimanis Mariss Freimanis is online now
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Posts: 751
Mariss Freimanis is on a distinguished road
No or maybe if I misunderstand your question.

Most switching drives depend on a reference voltage. Once the motor current sense reaches that reference, the drive reverses the direction of current change and the current revereses. The result is the motor current oscillates between the peak value set by the reference level as a peak and some value below that.

The motor responds only to the avarage value (0.5 peak to peak subtracted from the peak value). This introduces a negative offset equal to 0.5 peak to peak value. This in turn results in a crossover distortion equal to that value. Our means of compensating for this error is to introduce a constant positive adjustable offset via the ADJUST trimpot to null this V/L error. The result is a motor phase current that passes thru zero without any discontinuity.

Kreutz. You are a very smart guy. I have followed your posts and I am impressed with your thinking. Why don't you PM or e-mail me at geckohall@cox.net so I can meet you. We are not at cross-purposes at all. You are doing unpolar drives and I would like to take the oppertunity to talk you out of that.:-)

Mariss
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

  #10   Add to kreutz's Reputation   Report Post  
Old 05-23-2007, 03:55 PM
kreutz kreutz is offline
Master Machinist
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: US
Posts: 1,087
kreutz is on a distinguished road
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mariss Freimanis View Post
No or maybe if I misunderstand your question.

Most switching drives depend on a reference voltage. Once the motor current sense reaches that reference, the drive reverses the direction of current change and the current revereses. The result is the motor current oscillates between the peak value set by the reference level as a peak and some value below that.

The motor responds only to the average value (0.5 peak to peak subtracted from the peak value). This introduces a negative offset equal to 0.5 peak to peak value. This in turn results in a crossover distortion equal to that value. Our means of compensating for this error is to introduce a constant positive adjustable offset via the ADJUST trimpot to null this V/L error. The result is a motor phase current that passes thru zero without any discontinuity.

Kreutz. You are a very smart guy. I have followed your posts and I am impressed with your thinking. Why don't you PM or e-mail me at geckohall@cox.net so I can meet you. We are not at cross-purposes at all. You are doing unpolar drives and I would like to take the oppertunity to talk you out of that.:-)

Mariss
Well, your circuit might not be the same but it works in a similar way and for the same purpose the "slope compensation" works, basically, true current mode conversion should make the inductor current follow an error voltage, so the inductor becomes effectively a voltage controlled current source. By resistively adding a voltage (fraction of the PWM oscillator ramp) to the sensed current, it is possible to convert a peak current detector into an average current detector, allowing for a better current mode control. This system is used extensively on switching power supplies.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

  #11   Add to kevinkoons's Reputation   Report Post  
Old 05-23-2007, 04:21 PM
kevinkoons kevinkoons is offline
Chip Sweeper
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Age: 43
Posts: 10
kevinkoons is on a distinguished road
Thank You!

Hello Mariss,

Thank you for your advise! When I first did the retrofit on this machine and began tuning the motors, I hadn't touched the trim pots at all. When everything was working as it should I began to further fine tune the machine. There was some vibration on the X & Y axis so I began fussing with the trim pots. When I realized that going too far clock-wise cause the motor to stop (and sound bad) I turned the pot back to the left a tad and left it. I think the problem was I had it too far CW.

I have taken your advise Mariss and set them to about 11 o-clock. From there I really didn't need to adjust anymore. Actually on the Y axis for some reason the motor causes a lot of vibration at 5 ipm and the trim pot will not adjust it out so I picked a "happy place" and left it for now. At this point I just want to know that the machine will run with out stopping!

I'm testing the machine now and will let everyone know how it turns out!


Thanks to all that responded, I appreciate it very much!!

Kevin

Last edited by kevinkoons : 05-23-2007 at 04:23 PM. Reason: forgot to mention something
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

  #12   Add to kevinkoons's Reputation   Report Post  
Old 05-24-2007, 02:46 AM
kevinkoons kevinkoons is offline
Chip Sweeper
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Age: 43
Posts: 10
kevinkoons is on a distinguished road
Still not working...

Hello everyone,

After adjusting the trim pot on my 212 drives as suggested by Mariss I am still having a problem with the motors stopping or tripping the drive protection circuit.

Next I turned the trim pot all the way CCW (0%) and ran the machine, same thing after a little while the one of the axis motors will quit.

Last night I ran the machine (cutting air) for six hours. The X and Z axis motors both quit but the Y did not. In all of my attempts at solving this problem I had changed the micro step setting. The Z is set for 10 micro step and the X was set for full step. The Y on the other hand was (is) set to 5 micro step.

At one point I had all motors set for 10 micro step and ALL motors would quit at random when running at less than 20 imp.

Mike said he is running at 5 micro step so I'm giving this a shot in conjunction with a fan blowing on the drives and all drives have the trim pot full CCW or 0% position.

I'm still looking for answers at this point....


Update: After running almost 5 hours, same "sample" code I ran last night, everything seems to be working well! I have the drives set to 5 micro step and a fan blowing on the drive units.

It would seem the fan has helped, sorry to have doubted you Mike, thanks for the tip!!

Still doing some testing and will let you know how it all turns out.

Anyone using the Bridgeport steppers with Mach? What settings are you using on X & Y in motor tuning?

Thanks,

Kevin

Last edited by kevinkoons : 05-24-2007 at 07:47 AM.
Reply With Quote Multi-Quote This Message Quick reply to this message

Sponsored Links
Reply


Go Back   CNCzone.com-The Ultimate Machinist Community > Electronics > Gecko Drives


Quick Reply
Message:
Remove Text Formatting
Bold
Italic
Underline

Insert Image
Wrap [QUOTE] tags around selected text
 
Check Spelling
Decrease Size
Increase Size
Options


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (1 members and 0 guests)
AlanD

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may post attachments
You may edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



All times are GMT +12. The time now is 04:11 AM.




Powered by vBulletin Version 3.6.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2007, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
CNCzone,LLC Copyright ©2003,2004